Aug 16, 2018 in Viewpoint
SaaS is the foundation of multi-tenancy buildings
In the future, we’ll see a rise in so-called “multi-tenant buildings”. Centralized and integrated office platforms are essential to structure the distribution of these buildings.
Just imagine four organizations in one building all implementing their own systems; booking a room would be a nightmare! To efficiently share resources, the systems to manage those resources need to act on the building-level, not on the level of an individual tenant. So, to make sure that the shared rooms aren’t double booked, you need a software multi-tenancy that suits the physical multi-tenancy of the building.
That’s where SaaS comes into play. In software terms, multi-tenancy is an architecture in which a single instance of a software application serves multiple customers. This architecture is quite common in SaaS services. For example, organizations that use a cloud solution for their email services (such as Office 365 or Gmail) do not have their “own” dedicated server farm running at the SaaS vendor. Instead, server resources are shared amongst tenants whilst a strict separation between the tenants is maintained on the functional and data level.
To make sure that the shared rooms aren’t double booked, you need a software multi-tenancy that suits the physical multi-tenancy of the building
A SaaS platform to support multi-tenancy
Although multitenancy in SaaS is an existing and common phenomenon, the rationale for choosing SaaS in multi-tenancy buildings is different. It’s not about increasing the efficiency of server resources, adding redundancy, or reducing operational costs of ICT administration. It’s all about manageability and sharing. Imagine four tenants in a building, all with their own ICT systems and facility management software. To allow for (for instance) room sharing, these four tenants would need to somehow interconnect their individual room booking systems. That’s six connections in total, maintained by four different ICT departments. In other words: a nightmare.
When instead a dedicated third-party platform for resource sharing is used, each of the tenants has their own integration with that platform, that they control and maintain. Adding and removing a tenant does not involve actions from the other tenants, as long as there is a clear set of common rules and standards that a tenant must adhere to in order to join the resource sharing community.
To summarize: when you want to provide services like room sharing at the building level, you will need your software solutions to act at the building level. Further, a clear set of standards is needed for the way that tenants technically communicate with that solution. With Mapiq we aim to cross the boundaries between organizations by offering such a SaaS platform that inherently supports multi-tenancy.
Exploring ideas at the intersection of bricks, bytes, and behavior. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter.
Viewpoint / Oct 15, 2019 / Esmee van Vliet
How to smarten up your office
The benefits of a smart office are enormous, from attracting and retaining talent to increasing the productivity of employees and reducing housing costs. But the previous viewpoints left out one big question. Probably the one you’ve been keen on finding out: how to smarten up your office? It’s no...Read more
Viewpoint / Oct 08, 2019 / Esmee van Vliet
3 statements with Philip Ross about the future of work
We had the pleasure of catching up with Philip Ross, in preparation for WORKTECH Amsterdam, which will take place on the 15th of November. Philip is the founder and CEO of UnWork.com and WORKTECH, an author, consultant, and commentator specializing in the future of work. He predicts the way new t...Read more